Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Shankar Unni Subject: Re: Problem call a cygwin command from a dos batch file Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:00:59 -0700 Lines: 10 Message-ID: References: <03C99898510C8C47945B932907D99AAA16EC56@E2KMEMMCS1.ftbco.ftn.com> <006a01c3561c$b44f1320$9901020a@api360.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (Compact) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <006a01c3561c$b44f1320$9901020a@api360.net> Lisbeth Kellogg wrote: > Yes. Now I get the same thing. But why don't I have to do it that way > in XP? It's nothing to do with the OS or Bill Gates' conspiracies. Consider the two *machines* as distinct entities, and examine their configurations (all environment variables, all .rc scripts) to see what's different between the two. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/