Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Andrew DeFaria Subject: Re: apache problems gone with 1.50 Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 15:50:28 -0700 Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, zh In-Reply-To: Bill McCormick wrote: > I installed cygwin 1.50 and my apache problems have ceased. This is good to hear. Perhaps I will switch from Apache for Windows -> Apache under Cygwin. Only problem is I also trying to move my web site over to a Linux box instead - which makes this all kinda moot. However I do have a friend who wishes to host his web site on a Windows box and I am contemplating using Cygwin for most services. If Apache under Cygwin works well with 1.5.0 then perhaps I'll just go that way. I wonder if anybody has measured the speed difference between Apache for Windows and Apache under Cygwin... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/