Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
From: Rolf Campbell <rcampbell@tropicnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: Anyone trying 1.5.0 for anything other than managed mode?
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 18:24:19 -0400
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <bf4j94$98t$1@main.gmane.org>
References: <20030716171215.GA12514@redhat.com>
Reply-To: IDontLikePersonalReplies@hotmail.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <20030716171215.GA12514@redhat.com>

I've been using 1.5.0 for my large build environment since it was 
released.  No problems yet.  (in fact, I notice the speed improvement 
over 1.3.22 -- you know, that sparse file thing).

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Can I take the silence on bug reports for anything other than managed
> mode as a good sign.
> 
> The list of packages built with 1.5.0 is growing.  I hope we'll see a
> list of available packages here (and maybe in cygwin-announce) we reach
> critical mass.
> 
> cgf
> --
> Please use the resources at cygwin.com rather than sending personal email.
> Special for spam email harvesters: send email to aaaspam@sourceware.org
> and be permanently blocked from mailing lists at sources.redhat.com
> 



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

