Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 11:11:13 +0100 (BST)
From: andrew brian clegg <a.clegg@mail.cryst.bbk.ac.uk>
X-X-Sender: fcleg01@sark.cryst.bbk.ac.uk
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Apache mod_ssl fork problem
In-Reply-To: <Pine.CYG.4.55.0307062126270.2872@ellixia>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307071106000.24387-100000@sark.cryst.bbk.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact CCSG (http://www.cryst.bbk.ac.uk/CCSG/) more information
X-MailScanner-cryst-bbk: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-31.6, required 9,
	BAYES_01, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, IN_REP_TO,
	QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, QUOTE_TWICE_1, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,
	USER_AGENT_PINE)


On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Elfyn McBratney wrote:

> On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, andrew brian clegg wrote:

> > over and over. I've tried rebasing everything as discussed in
> >
> > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-10/msg00698.html
> >
> > but with no joy, cygssl.dll still doesn't want to remap. I made sure I had
> > nothing but bash running when I did the rebase, closed all services etc...

> You need to rebase all of your CYgwin DLL's. If you don't already have the
> 'rebase' package installed, install it, and make sure there are *no* Cygwin
> processes running (this includes cygrunsrv services. conform with `pw -e'). Then

You mean ps not pw right?

> you need to open up a command.com/cmd.exe bash shell (you cannot use rxvt) and
> type
> 
>   rebaseall -v

Thanks, I'll try it tonight when I get home. Just out of curiosity -- I
rebased everything in /bin as well as /lib/apache, and cygssl.dll is in
/bin -- what does rebaseall do differently that will make it work for
cases where rebase didn't?

You mentioned a little while ago that Apache is slightly broken until 
Cygwin 1.5, does this problem relate to that brokenness?

Thanks for the tips,

Andrew.



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

