Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
From: Chuck <chuckh@softhome.net>
Subject: Re: at command
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 18:13:36 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <Xns93959125EF248chuckhsofthomenet@80.91.224.249>
References: <5spqm44brqc5.dlg@thorstenkampe.de> <Pine.GSO.4.44.0306081101230.25752-100000@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25

Igor Pechtchanski <pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu> wrote in
news:Pine.GSO.4.44.0306081101230.25752-100000@slinky.cs.nyu.edu: 

> On Sat, 7 Jun 2003, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> 
>> * Chuck (2003-06-04 15:28 +0200)
>> > Is there a unix style "at" command for cygwin? I've searched the
>> > libs but found nothing.
>>
>> Something wrong with at.exe?
> 
>> > Is there a unix style "at" command for cygwin?
>                ^^^^^^^^^^
> Windows' "at.exe" is very unintuitive, doesn't allow for granularity
> finer than 1 minute, and is generally completely different from the
> Unix-style one.
>      Igor

An in addition it just plain sucks.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

