Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 09:02:56 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: ssh-agent eats 80% cpu time Message-ID: <20030522070256.GI19367@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <1053502004.18017.ezmlm@cygwin.com> <000b01c31f71$acbd04a0$42529a09@IBMJY56AED2CIQ> <87fzn8c86l.fsf@blarg.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87fzn8c86l.fsf@blarg.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 02:16:02PM -0700, Eric Hanchrow wrote: > I was under the impression that it was a Bad Idea to run ssh-agent on > Cygwin: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2001-01/msg00063.html (look > for the words FUNDAMENTALLY INSECURE). Does anyone know if this is > really the case? You *did* realize that this message is over two years old, don't you? The "fundamentally insecureness" has been solved using a securing mechanism for AF_UNIX sockets (courtesy Egor Duda, first implementation 2001-06-30). Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/