Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Message-ID: <3EC55909.3030508@attglobal.net> Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 14:32:57 -0700 From: Doug VanLeuven User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030401 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: cygwin + samba pdc = ssh problem [FAQ alert] References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >On 14 May 2003, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > >>Doug VanLeuven wrote: >> >>| You'll need to set CYGWIN=smbntsec (plus whatever else you might be >>| using) and "nt acl support = yes" in smb.conf for the affected shares >> >>This worked ! Thanks an awfully lot for the tip. I don't know what we'd >>have done otherwise - probably dump cygwin altogether I think. I'm >>actually surprised this is not documented in the FAQ next in the chmod >>is not working part. >> >>Best regards, >> >> > >Nicolas, > >Would you care to write a relevant FAQ section/amendment outlining what >you did and contribute it (post it to this list)? That way the Cygwin FAQ >maintainer can pick it up and put it in the FAQ right away. Perhaps Doug >could help also... After all, . > Igor > > I wouldn't mind, but first I'd rather have a philosophical discussion on whether or not nosmbntsec is "doing the right thing" in the manner of translating "Take Ownership" or if samba should rethink whether it actually needs a plceholder characteristic. -- Doug VanLeuven -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/