Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Shankar Unni Subject: Re: redistributing cygwin1.dll Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 10:12:47 -0700 Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: <20030512155928.0f98d16f.khali@linux-fr.org> <20030512142302.GB23680@redhat.com> <20030512171354.1f851221.khali@linux-fr.org> <20030512174720.GE25507@redhat.com> <20030513012322.GA4077@redhat.com> <20030513060932.GA5853@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030507 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: Patrick J. LoPresti wrote: > A) Redistributing a GPL binary as-is, for free, with clear > indications of where the source can be obtained > It would be simple to craft language which would let you INFORMALLY > permit (A) without diminishing your ability to prosecute (B). Of > course, this would require that you have some desire to distinguish > these cases, which obviously you do not. I take it you haven't bandied words with RMS? :-) -- Shankar. PS The answer is "no" to that last statement, but it's not a personal cgf thing. That's the whole point to the GNU philosophy.. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/