Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: cygipc (and PostgreSQL) XP problem resolved! From: Robert Collins To: cygwin@cygwin.com In-Reply-To: <20030510082949.GD19367@cygbert.vinschen.de> References: <20030506174725.GE1652@tishler.net> <3EB84F52.3020608@ece.gatech.edu> <20030507133326.GA1824@tishler.net> <3EB9A54B.8060500@ece.gatech.edu> <20030508135217.GD512@tishler.net> <3EBB22F5.4000801@ece.gatech.edu> <1052541657.1675.5.camel@localhost> <3EBC8ED0.4040906@ece.gatech.edu> <20030510072239.GA19367@cygbert.vinschen.de> <1052554219.1824.14.camel@localhost> <20030510082949.GD19367@cygbert.vinschen.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-X+KMt4326runw8DaM68L" Organization: Message-Id: <1052556698.1661.41.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: 10 May 2003 18:51:38 +1000 --=-X+KMt4326runw8DaM68L Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2003-05-10 at 18:29, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >=20 > Is there actually a need to convert key_t to 64 bit? Using 64 bit made generating key values very simple. But, as I'm not maintaining that code currently :}... Rob --=20 GPG key available at: . --=-X+KMt4326runw8DaM68L Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+vL2aI5+kQ8LJcoIRAhq3AKC6yUKgz1uX+iNcoG9wqyL81NacXQCgwYNG 3zEd/hYBAJ/toAPr593U/5U= =mwFV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-X+KMt4326runw8DaM68L--