Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Message-ID: <3EBB22F5.4000801@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 23:39:33 -0400 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030401 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason Tishler CC: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: cygipc (and PostgreSQL) XP problem resolved! References: <20030506174725.GE1652@tishler.net> <3EB84F52.3020608@ece.gatech.edu> <20030507133326.GA1824@tishler.net> <3EB9A54B.8060500@ece.gatech.edu> <20030508135217.GD512@tishler.net> In-Reply-To: <20030508135217.GD512@tishler.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jason Tishler wrote: > Chuck, > > On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 08:31:07PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > >>I think this needs to be a runtime function, not a compiletime macro. > > > Given Igor's validation, improvements, and corrections of/to my patch, > do you still want a runtime function approach? Or, is the (ugly and > possibly performance affecting) macro approach OK? Nope -- I'm an idiot. You and Igor are correct. But I'm more concerned about the other issues I raised, to which nobody has yet responded (although I'm still working thru the mail). To whit: 64 bit key_t and coordination with cygwin dll/newlib. --Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/