Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 10:43:52 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: New package: rpm-4.1-1 Message-ID: <20030508144352.GA28962@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20030506161952.A30179@ns.helixdigital.com> <3EB9F82B.5000605@linuxforum.net> <20030507235738.C24620@ns.helixdigital.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030507235738.C24620@ns.helixdigital.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 11:57:38PM -0700, Dario Alcocer wrote: >On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 02:24:43PM +0800, David Huang wrote: > >> I have installed rpm, rpm-build and rpm-doc from net releases, but >> I can't find /usr/include/rpm*.h and /usr/lib/lib*. Dose it miss a >> package rpm-devel? And looks like librpm, librpmbuild, librpmio and >> librpmdb were built in static lib format, why not buld them in DLL >> format? The .exe files are too big. > >Yes, you're correct; I've put off an rpm-devel package until I can build >shared library versions of the RPM libraries, and that should happen in >the next few weeks, although I can't promise anything. If we're missing header files are we still GPL compliant or isn't RPM GPLed? cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/