Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Message-ID: <3EB975CA.90905@lapo.it> Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 23:08:26 +0200 From: Lapo Luchini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030503 X-Accept-Language: it, en, fr, es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: cygwin's exit status / errorlevel References: <3EB85657.2040406@lapo.it> <20030507015801.GG10709@redhat.com> <3EB8B535.3030303@lapo.it> <20030507141558.GC26264@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20030507141558.GC26264@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Christopher Faylor wrote: >>I was mainly referring to the strangeness that windows errorlevel is set >>correct but executing from Mozilla does not... anyway, I guess enigmail >>people should continue on their "let's convert any 256 errorcode to 2 >>and assume it is cygwin's fault". >> >> >Yeah, it's cygwin's "fault" for assuming that it should be compliant >with UNIX. > I didn't meant that... well, anyway. -- Lapo 'Raist' Luchini lapo@lapo.it (PGP & X.509 keys available) http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796) -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/