Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Message-ID: <114780-22003515161038168@M2W027.mail2web.com> X-Priority: 3 Reply-To: lhall@rfk.com X-Originating-IP: 209.113.174.244 From: "lhall@pop.ma.ultranet.com" To: jbaker@qnx.com, cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: RE: Compile times in Windows Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 12:10:38 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 May 2003 16:08:29.0999 (UTC) FILETIME=[91A66BF0:01C31320] Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id h45G7cH10473 Have you tried/looked at ccache? Larry Original Message: ----------------- From: Jeff Baker jbaker@qnx.com Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 11:13:49 -0400 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Compile times in Windows I know this question is somewhat vague, but that's how it was presented to me so that's what I have to start with. I've been asked to find a way to make gcc and the binutils faster in Windows ( Cygwin ). Before I get down to the level of profiling the code I thought I'd ask if there are any compile time options I may not be aware of that might speed the works up a little. For the record I've already sent this question to the binutils mailing list as well. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ . -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/