Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com X-Originating-IP: [150.101.195.152] X-Originating-Email: [tilps@hotmail.com] From: "Gareth Pearce" To: References: Subject: Re: Cygwin survey: Next vim version with perl support? Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 09:17:16 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Apr 2003 23:17:19.0398 (UTC) FILETIME=[A5806460:01C30F6E] > Because the "cat/sed" combination is much harder to use :) > > On second thought, make that a "visual editor"... Amusingly - nano with every available feature turned on, is only 5% larger than cat + sed. It is 45% larger then ed though. I wont bother comparing it to vim or emacs... (Okay so i ignored library dependcies in the above comparisons - I dont think i'm cheating Too much) Gareth - bias revealed, returns to the shadows. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/