Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 15:25:48 +0100 (BST) From: andrew brian clegg X-X-Sender: fcleg01@sark.cryst.bbk.ac.uk To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Cygwin survey: Next vim version with perl support? In-Reply-To: <20030430083411.GR19711@cygbert.vinschen.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact CCSG (http://www.cryst.bbk.ac.uk/CCSG/) more information X-MailScanner-cryst-bbk: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-17.8, required 10, BAYES_00, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, IN_REP_TO, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, USER_AGENT_PINE) > === cut here === > > [ ] Yes, please add perl support to the next Cygwin vim release. > > [X] No, go away with that. > > [ ] What's vim? > > === cut here === My first thought was "yeah, that'd be cool" but on reflection I'm with whoever said that people who would be happy using Perl from within vim ought to be clueful enough to compile it in for themselves. I think it was the joke about vim making Emacs look lightweight that made me stop and think... Andrew. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/