Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 08:46:02 -0500 From: Joshua Daniel Franklin To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Cygwin survey: Next vim version with perl support? Message-ID: <20030430084602.A4650@ns1.iocc.com> References: <20030430083411.GR19711@cygbert.vinschen.de> <20030430094847.GE52453@justpickone.org> <20030430100121.GV19711@cygbert.vinschen.de> <871xzkkxqs.fsf@peder.flower> <20030430115812.GY19711@cygbert.vinschen.de> <87llxsjhz1.fsf@peder.flower> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <87llxsjhz1.fsf@peder.flower>; from janneke@gnu.org on Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 02:19:14PM +0200 > Corinna Vinschen writes: > > [ ] Yes, please add perl support to the next Cygwin vim release. > > [X] No, go away with that > > [ ] What's vim? What I'd really like is someone (me, but in a few months?) to package the tiniest, most library-independent vi we could find and put it in "Base". Then vim could be the biggest mega-emacs-sized vi ever, reminiscent of "Vim has become too big. Please use Emacs. Thankyou." But the real show-stopper about the perl support right now is that perl 5.8 doesn't seem to be working for some people. That, and would anyone actually be using the perl support in vim? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/