Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 23:03:40 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: cat stories Message-ID: <20030426030340.GA16433@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20030426024434.GB16165@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 10:48:45PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >> However to answer your question, no, I don't think adding non-POSIX >> functions to cygwin is the way to go. If you want to add >> cygwin-specific code, then just check for "foo." rather than "foo". > >Ah. I feel properly shamed. I even think we've been through this >before... If we have, I don't remember. If I had remembered about "foo.", I would have stepped in earlier with that suggestion. It didn't occur to me until I was answering your email. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/