Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Nicholas Wourms Subject: Re: perl 5.8.0-2 and WaitForMultipleObjects under win98 Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 11:56:59 -0400 Lines: 23 Message-ID: <3E92F14B.7020801@netscape.net> References: <3E8D9891.1020504@email.byu.edu> <3E8DEA6A.6030605@netscape.net> <31849447971.20030405105207@familiehaase.de> <3E8EDC25.5000505@netscape.net> <20030407122702.GE2536@tishler.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Jason Tishler wrote: > Nicholas, > > On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 08:37:41AM -0500, Nicholas Wourms wrote: > >>Hopefully it won't require rebase to run the tests... > > > Why? Ralf and I wrote rebase just for *you*! :,) > > Jason > No, my point wasn't to insult rebase, rather that the testing phase of perl is automated and combined with the building phase. In the current scheme, conflicting dlls would cause the errors and so on and so forth... So in this case I suppose I could edit the perl build system to run rebase... Cheers, Nicholas -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/