Subject: spell and nano (was reply to cgf about gpl violation)
From: "Gareth Pearce" <[email-masked]>
To: "Nano-devel list" <[email-masked]>
Cc: <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:46:34 +1000

(crossing to cygwin incase it might inspire someone)
> use nano; for the same reason the (webpage) nano binary uses PDcurses
rather than
> ncurses so no termcap files are needed.  I think the cygwin provided
> version of nano is far superior as things like spell check would
> actually work,
This would be a theory - however since no one has ported and packaged spell
to cygwin - it is not yet the (general) case.

Regards,
Gareth - cygwin nano packager.
(PS: Waiting for cgf's supprised look - since nano-devel's Chris complied
immediately - or at least is trying too...)

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/