Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Message-ID: <3E8B6B5D.8000501@cygwin.com> Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 08:59:41 +1000 From: Robert Collins User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-au, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rainer Typke CC: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: bug with setup.exe: saw tetex-beta even though I did not select prev References: <3E8B1752.1040207@cs.uu.nl> In-Reply-To: <3E8B1752.1040207@cs.uu.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Rainer Typke wrote: > > I think that setup.exe presented the tetex-beta version in the list even > though I did not select [prev]. > Thi is by design. We have a single namespace for all packages, even if they don't have [curr] elements. In fact prev only elements get promoted to curr. But: You should still have recieved consistent packages, what didn't get installed? Rob -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/