Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <3E7905B6.8070702@ece.gatech.edu>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 19:05:10 -0500
From: Charles Wilson <cwilson@ece.gatech.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [dpaun@rogers.com: [RFC] windres' -I option]
References: <20030319202047.GD27723@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Anyone have any problems with this?  I agree that it makes sense to make
> -I behave consistently.  Are there scripts which would be fatally impacted
> if we made this switch?

Okay by me, but you'll need to change winsup/w32api/lib/Makefile.in 
eventually.

--Chuck



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

