Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: ronald owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 15:44:34 +0100 (CET) From: Ronald Landheer-Cieslak X-X-Sender: ronald@localhost.localdomain To: Max Bowsher cc: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: follow-up on crlf regression (was Re: regression in current CVS) In-Reply-To: <003701c2ea34$ff865d70$78d96f83@pomello> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: > Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote: > > If I followed the discussion on newlib at sources dot rehat dot com > > correctly, > I'm afraid you haven't followed the discussion correctly. The patch > isn't in yet. > > all required patches are now in CVS and it should, thus, work, without > > applying them manually, right? > Try starting from the link Corinna gave: > >>> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-developers/2003-03/msg00046.html That's where I started, but I now see I had the time-line reversed: the last message in the thread on newlib at sources dot redhat dot com is http://sources.redhat.com/ml/newlib/2003/msg00173.html sent on Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:29:29 +0100; the message I thought applied the proper patches was http://sources.redhat.com/ml/newlib/2003/msg00151.html sent on Fri, 7 Mar 2003 21:42:39 +0100 - a week earlier. (In the thread index, it comes after the message sent a week later, and I didn't pay attention to the dates..) My fault, sorry :| rlc -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/