Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20030312095452.00fb5a70@pop3.cris.com> X-Sender: rrschulz@pop3.cris.com Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 09:59:46 -0800 To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Randall R Schulz Subject: Re: cygwin gcc 3.4 and cygwin In-Reply-To: <20030312163935.GA15393@redhat.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed At 08:39 2003-03-12, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 10:13:35AM -0600, Brian Ford wrote: > >On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 10:54:13PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > >>FWIW, I build cygwin itself with an unpatched version of gcc several > >>times a day. > >> > > > >Gee. I hope Cygwin, and anything else you compile with that compiler for > >Cygwin, does not have structures containing doubles. Without > >MASK_ALIGN_DOUBLE in TARGET_SUBTARGET_DEFAULT of gcc/config/i386/cygwin.h, > >the standard Cygwin compiler and vanilla gcc are ABI incompatible. > > > >Doesn't this seem bad? > >Oh, it seems horrific. Now I won't be able to sleep at night. Thanks a lot. > >cgf Look, Faylor. If you're not willing to personally be and likewise to make Cygwin itself along with each and and every piece of software it includes all things for all people, then you're just mean. Oh, right... RRS -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/