Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 11:39:35 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: cygwin gcc 3.4 and cygwin Message-ID: <20030312163935.GA15393@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 10:13:35AM -0600, Brian Ford wrote: >On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 10:54:13PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >>FWIW, I build cygwin itself with an unpatched version of gcc several >>times a day. >> > >Gee. I hope Cygwin, and anything else you compile with that compiler for >Cygwin, does not have structures containing doubles. Without >MASK_ALIGN_DOUBLE in TARGET_SUBTARGET_DEFAULT of gcc/config/i386/cygwin.h, >the standard Cygwin compiler and vanilla gcc are ABI incompatible. > >Doesn't this seem bad? Oh, it seems horrific. Now I won't be able to sleep at night. Thanks a lot. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/