Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20030228155548.02c8d418@pop3.cris.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:01:20 -0800
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
From: Randall R Schulz <rrschulz@cris.com>
Subject: RE: how to run a process from DOS  within a cygwin .bat file
In-Reply-To: <1720D5C9CF7AD411B30700010226ECC9073763F8@atlexchange.inter
 nal.secureworks.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

Tom,

In any Open Source project, the primary way to deal with a deficiency 
is to rectify it.

Reasonable project principals will welcome any constructive feedback, 
but they should not be expected to share the priorities of any 
particular complainant. If you absolutely positively must have 
something, then the best thing to do is create it yourself. In some 
cases, cash contributions (from those with more money than time and / 
or skills) can help facilitate progress by contributors with the usual 
material needs.

Randall Schulz


At 11:24 2003-02-28, Tom Dager wrote:
>Damn...and that is why I rarely post questions here....sad.
>
>If the "manual" was a cohesive, comprehensive document that I could curl up
>with and read until my eyes bleed that would ALWAYS be the correct thing to
>do. Instead you have to read a FAQ, some documentation, archives, yada,
>yada, yada.
>
>BTW...I am not bashing the documentors or anything, just sick of seeing the
>RTFM response.
>
>TlD


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/