Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20030217080859.01da50d8@pop3.cris.com> X-Sender: rrschulz@pop3.cris.com Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 08:15:39 -0800 To: Dalibor Topic , Cygwin Mailing List From: Randall R Schulz Subject: Re: Is gcc 2 still supported in cygwin at all? In-Reply-To: <20030217093604.32370.qmail@web10010.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Dalibor, At 01:36 2003-02-17, Dalibor Topic wrote: >I'm just wondering, because I got 0 replies for my bugreport on this >mailing list last week. Install the "gcc2" package. However, the GCC 3.2.x compiler almost certainly did not introduce optimizer bugs as your report suggests. Far more likely is that it exposed bugs in the code you're compiling. Randall Schulz >cheers, >dalibor topic -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/