Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 10:38:17 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Is gcc 2 still supported in cygwin at all? Message-ID: <20030217153817.GA3564@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20030217093604.32370.qmail@web10010.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030217093604.32370.qmail@web10010.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 01:36:04AM -0800, Dalibor Topic wrote: >I'm just wondering, because I got 0 replies for my >bugreport on this mailing list last week. It's supported, but, like everything, unless you can demonstrate with a *simple* test case that there is actually a gcc problem (which is unlikely) rather than a programming error (which is more likely), you aren't apt to get much help. And, FYI, "it works on linux" is not a guaranteed indication that there is a problem with cygwin's gcc. cgf -- Please use the resources at cygwin.com rather than sending personal email. Special for spam email harvesters: send email to aaaspam@sourceware.org and be permanently blocked from mailing lists at sources.redhat.com -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/