Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Charles Wilson Subject: Re: [Problem] mempcpy is missing? (FAQ alert) Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 20:50:02 -0500 Lines: 12 Message-ID: <3E4EEE4A.5020302@ece.gatech.edu> References: <20030215210505.GA29578@redhat.com> <010601c2d537$decb05c0$78d96f83@pomello> <20030215215840.GA3446@redhat.com> <3E4EC408.8070500@ece.gatech.edu> <004201c2d546$ba7482a0$78d96f83@pomello> <3E4ECC52.50609@ece.gatech.edu> <20030215234909.GB12171@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Christopher Faylor wrote: > Breaking up the headers or > adding a OS-specific "capability.h", or something similar, which defines > __HAVE_CLOCK would probably be the best way to deal with this. Assuming > that this was a major issue -- which I don't think it is. You mean, if it ain't broke don't mess with it? Where have I heard that before... --Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/