Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 16:39:53 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Bug in path.cc (conv_path_list_buf_size) Message-ID: <20030205213953.GA11032@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20030205164021.GA1408@stonie.insonic.com> <20030205210237.GB30513@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030205210237.GB30513@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 04:02:37PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 05:40:21PM +0100, Daniel Steinmann wrote: >>The above mentioned function returns sometimes a too small buffer >>size. This problem was found when using 'cygpath --path --windows' >> >>I see following solutions: >> >>a) Increase the slop. >> >>b) Make the size estimation more precise by adding the size of >> the current working directory for each relativ path element. >> >>What do you think? > >I'll add something which should suffice to work around the problem for >1.3.20. There is a new snapshot up with the change, if you want to try it. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/