Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <3E38C631.6050301@ece.gatech.edu>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 01:29:05 -0500
From: Charles Wilson <cwilson@ece.gatech.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: getopt_long behavior
References: <E18dzmF-0002Lr-00@smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net> <20030130010056.GA3603@redhat.com> <3E38B5DB.5090801@ece.gatech.edu> <20030130055757.GA1554@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Christopher Faylor wrote:

> He didn't say "cygwin kernel".  He said "cygwin suite", as in suite
> of programs.  If someone wants a cygwin distribution which uses
> non-posix options, they will have to recompile and rebuild the
> whole cygwin release.

Yes, you are correct.  I thought the original poster was only concerned 
with the behavior of a single "problematic" program; re-reading, it 
seems your interpretation is better.  Sorry for the noise.

--Chuck



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

