Subject: Re: tclsh83.exe should be cygtclsh83.exe
From: "S. L." <[email-masked]>
To: Charles Wilson <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked]
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 08:26:57 +0100 (MET)

[...]
> If that is NOT what you are suggestion -- e.g. that only tclsh83 should 
> be renamed -- why?  Why is tclsh83 special?
[...]

<g>
[cough, ough!]
Yes, yes, why?! Why is it the one and only cygwin app (except the specific
applications, e.g. cygcheck, cygpath) that cannot do a "$ /bin/tclsh83.exe
/usr/share/tcl8.3/tcltest1.0/tcltest.tcl" returning a  "couldn't read file
"/usr/share/tcl8.3/tcltest1.0/tcltest.tcl": no such file or directory" message ?!
:))
</g>

No joke, now, actually it IS special, but this is it. To quote, "any patches
...", 'right ?! :))

SLao

-- 
+++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more  http://www.gmx.net +++
NEU: Mit GMX ins Internet. Rund um die Uhr für 1 ct/ Min. surfen!

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/