Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 16:53:52 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: "'cygwin@cygwin.com'" Subject: Re: setting socket option SO_RCVTIMEO doesn't affect blocking behavio r of recvfrom Message-ID: <20030115155352.GV1373@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: "'cygwin@cygwin.com'" References: <3B2480653E7D2C4E8AA5699598D691C429FF74@xch-se-03.se.nos.boeing.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3B2480653E7D2C4E8AA5699598D691C429FF74@xch-se-03.se.nos.boeing.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 09:40:55AM -0600, Lane, Frank L wrote: > Wanting to keep things as simple as possible I thought of using setsockopt > to force a 10 second timeout on the blocking call to recvfrom. The level > used was SOL_SOCKET and the option was SO_RECVTIMEO with the time struct > loaded with a 10 for the seconds member. The behavior of the application > appears unchanged by the call to setsockopt. > [...] > Any help will be appreciated. SO_RECVTIMEO isn't supported by WinSock, unfortunately. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/