Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
From: "Fish" <fish@infidels.org>
To: <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: RE: Missed patch?  (gettimeofday time travels V2)
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 18:46:31 -0800
Keywords: fish
Message-ID: <000f01c2bc40$4f3b2440$0100a8c0@asswipe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <20030114203757.GA6145@redhat.com>
Importance: Normal

 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Christopher Faylor wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 09:55:15PM -0800, Fish wrote:
> > 
> >Is there any reason why Philip Aston's 6 Jul 2002 patch to
> >gettimeofday et. al. logic to correct for WM_POWERBROADCAST events
> >(PBT_APMRESUMESUSPEND, PBT_APMRESUMEAUTOMATIC,
> >PBT_APMRESUMECRITICAL) hasn't made it into the sources yet?
> >
> >http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-05/msg00962.html
> >
> >Was this perhaps just a simple oversight? Or was there another
> >reason for it not being applied?
> 
> Perhaps it would be instructive if you read the whole thread.

Perhaps I already did.

Perhaps it doesn't explain what is meant by "sacrific[ing] accuracy
for precision", nor precisely WHY "QueryPerformance* functions [is]
bad news", nor cite the vague "various references" mentioned.

AND PERHAPS you could just answer my question or perhaps point me to
a different thread instead (that perhaps DOES have the answers I
seek) instead of wasting my others' time with such unhelpful replies.

Do you think perhaps that is possible?

Or is that perhaps asking too much?

- -- 
"Fish" (David B. Trout)
   fish@infidels.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.4

iQA/AwUBPiTLhkj11/TE7j4qEQLVBwCdFFe/nmRUBU9AcrAOtwI4oeH4pqsAoLdR
qQYOSaG9Dra0JgJLC31AR12D
=StPp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/