Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 18:20:38 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: inetutils ftpd fcntl(F_SETOWN) failure message suppression patch Message-ID: <20030109182038.G21839@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20030103133222.GA1712@tishler.net> <20030107150428.A14974@cygbert.vinschen.de> <20030109164436.GA1064@tishler.net> <20030109164943.GA3100@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030109164943.GA3100@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 11:49:43AM -0500, Chris Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 11:44:36AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote: > >Would you be willing to to consider the following: > > > > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-10/msg00116.html > > > >Or, is it too esoteric for you? > > Judging by the description, that sounds more like a patch for the FSF > inetutils maintainer than for the Cygwin inetutils maintainer. I agree. I don't really want to add functionality besides what is normal for this inetutils. In the long run, we should consider to get rid of this inetutils anyway and substitute them by a new version started via cygrunsrv or sysvinit resp. Oh btw... wouldn't you better like to maintain ProFTPd for Cygwin? ;-) Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/