Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <3E19CC2E.5000506@lapo.it>
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2003 19:34:22 +0100
From: Lapo Luchini <lapo@lapo.it>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030102
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: gcj and -mno-cygwin
References: <3E19B8FE.304@decodon.com> <20030106173525.GA27737@redhat.com> <3E19C176.4050009@decodon.com>
In-Reply-To: <3E19C176.4050009@decodon.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Frank-Michael Moser wrote:

> Are there plans to implement -mno-cygwin for gcj? 

cygwin and no-cygwin are quite different platform, gcj would need to be 
ported "twice" in pratice and, of course, cygwin is closer to original 
linux's gcj.
Though I've just seen a "gcj release candidate" on http://www.mingw.org/ 
and AFAIK mingw is not-so-different from no-cygwin.
They have different meanings but I guess/hope one day they'll converge.

Anyway, as far as this ML is concerned, I think the reply to "there are 
plans?" is "no, but you can do them, if you want".

^_^

-- 
Lapo 'Raist' Luchini
lapo@lapo.it (PGP & X.509 keys available)
http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/