Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: FAO: cfg: defaults
From: Robert Collins <rbcollins@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
In-Reply-To: <20030105013324.GD11814@redhat.com>
References: <NCEBJJFMCAOKNNABBFIMAEIBCNAA.john.r.morrison@ntlworld.com>
	<5.2.0.9.2.20030104162127.0204c038@pop3.cris.com> 
	<20030105013324.GD11814@redhat.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-Ps1f42e39dahMGidxGG5"
Date: 05 Jan 2003 12:38:25 +1100
Message-Id: <1041730705.18547.250.camel@lifelesswks>
Mime-Version: 1.0

--=-Ps1f42e39dahMGidxGG5
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 12:33, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 04:24:53PM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote:
> >At 08:50 2003-01-04, John Morrison wrote:
> >>Please find for you perusal and review...  (long links, will wrap!)
> >
> >Why don't you enclose all URLs in email within angle brackets instead
> >of forcing people to reintegrate the wrapped links?  Even a short URL
> >can fall on a line wrap boundary if embedded in other text.
>=20
> I've noticed that people do this and I'm always curious as to why.  Is
> there a mail reader convention that causes angle bracket wrapped URLs to
> be properly understood?  I know that my mail reader doesn't understand
> them but...

Yes, there is. Uhmm, I *think* it was Eudora years and years ago that
did it first.

Rob
--=20
---
GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt.
---

--=-Ps1f42e39dahMGidxGG5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA+F4yRI5+kQ8LJcoIRAqtDAJ9H546TyZRlecAf7+WbvHgHQ7TcxACgruwK
CW9+JGI+quTpiYoftWG/gDg=
=ohcp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-Ps1f42e39dahMGidxGG5--