Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 16:13:42 -0500 From: "Pierre A. Humblet" To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Heads up: *possible* bug in cygwin Message-ID: <20030101211342.GA35586973@HPN5170X> Mail-Followup-To: "Pierre A. Humblet" , cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20030101100510.5b5b7f3f.steven.obrien2@ntlworld.com> <20030101170613.GA19419@redhat.com> <20030101171952.GA83996745@HPN5170X> <20030101173445.GA1354@redhat.com> <20030101194854.GA19827@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030101194854.GA19827@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 02:48:54PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > I've uploaded a new snapshot which should correctly calculate the buffer > size for overflow conditions and returns a large number for > _SC_GETPW_R_SIZE_MAX Chris, I don't understand your changes in getpwuid_r32. The uid and gid are stored in struct passwd pwd fields and don't consume any space in the buffer. The buffer is filled with the strcpy's toward the end. I don't see problems there. Pierre -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/