Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 14:39:19 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Bug somewhere between cygwin, gcc and cvs Message-ID: <20021225193919.GA6905@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <3E09F759.5040508@snet.net> <3E0A070D.2020107@snet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E0A070D.2020107@snet.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Wed, Dec 25, 2002 at 02:29:17PM -0500, Arkadiy Belousov wrote: >The version currently available does not support specifying port in >CVSROOT. And I need that for ssh tunneling. > >I do realize I am on the bleeding edge here. Still, it's something to >look at when CVS 1.11.2 is ported. Personally, I think it's the >compiler. Let's wait till gcc loses (prerelease) label on it. Despite appearances to the contrary, cygwin's gcc is based on the released version of gcc 3.2. There is no better version being planned. It sounds to me like this is a problem with opening a directory using open, as was previously suggested. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/