Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20021222193251.02837d18@pop3.cris.com> X-Sender: rrschulz@pop3.cris.com Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 19:56:04 -0800 To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Randall R Schulz Subject: Re: what to use in g++ instead of GetOpt? In-Reply-To: References: <5.2.0.9.2.20021221185540.027a74a8@pop3.cris.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Howdy, Igor, Yes. I guess the oxymoron confused me, especially since I always program in the buff. Randy (why not?) At 19:12 2002-12-22, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >Umm, Randy, not to downplay the humor or the valid points in your >soliloquy, but he did say "well-dressed C++ programmers", and everybody >knows (tm) that Real Programmers aren't well-dressed (they also don't use >C++, it's for the wavering who can't decide between C and Java [to >paraphrase]). Of course, this also depends on your definition of >"well-dressed"... > Igor -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/