Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Message-ID: <3E05C6DC.3080108@mysticom.com> Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 16:06:20 +0200 From: Genady Veytsman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Cygwin@Cygwin.Com" CC: Chris January , Genady Veytsman Subject: Re: permission denied for NTFS network shares References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit It seems you are right. I tried to use RSH without ".rhosts", supplying password and then all the shares were accessible. Now I just need to find a way to supply a password noninteractivly. I know that "rexec" allows to do it on unix, but there is no "rexec" in cygwin. Thanks Genady >Chris January wrote: >>Unix/Linux systems are much more secure then NT but they do allow RSH >>without password (using .rhosts). >> >>Are you saying that there is no way whatsoever to have RSH without >>passwords? I need it for running scripts/programs on different NT >>machines. Interactive behaviour (login/password) will not allow that >>since you can't hardcode your passwords in scripts. >> > AFAIK you'll need to supply a password at some point. You could try using > expect or something similar to pass the password through. > > Chris > > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/