Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 15:04:32 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: cygwin License related Query.... Message-ID: <20021218200432.GB15823@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <4223A04BF7D1B941A25246ADD0462FF55D5463@blr-m3-msg.wipro.com> <20021218155657.GD11184@redhat.com> <3E00CBE3.9070502@cotagesoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E00CBE3.9070502@cotagesoft.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 11:26:27AM -0800, Shankar Unni wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>Btw, I was trying to move this discussion off of the public list because >>it probably isn't of much interest to people there. > >Well, .. > >The Red Hat Cygwin Product pages are marvelously content-free when it >comes to cost and content (i.e. which version) information. They are not content-free of contact information, though. >Other mixed-license products (MySQL, etc.) are quite up-front about >licensing requirements, costs and versions supported commercially, with >exhaustive detail in their web pages. Perhaps Red Hat can be a little >more explicit on their pages? Just click on the contact Red Hat site. Cygwin is not MySQL. That should be fairly obvious. The licensing issues are much trickier. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/