Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 16:18:23 +0000 Message-ID: <3632-Wed13Nov2002161823+0000-starksb@ebi.ac.uk> From: David Starks-Browning MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Not just X (Was: Cygwin Emacs-X uses 99% of cpu) In-Reply-To: <6733-Wed13Nov2002144750+0000-starksb@ebi.ac.uk> References: <7BCD42353C1FD411A66200062939B2F1ACA4FB@EXCHANGE> <6733-Wed13Nov2002144750+0000-starksb@ebi.ac.uk> On Wednesday 13 Nov 02, David Starks-Browning writes: > I also observe emacs spinning. I see it with both emacs and > emacs-nox. I also see it on an old cygwin non-X build of xemacs-21.5. > So it's not strictly related to X. (Except that it is very easily > triggered by emacs + X.) > > I observe it in cygwin-1.3.15-1 and 1.3.15-2. It all goes away if I > revert to cygwin-1.14-1. This is WinNT 4.0. > > ... > > Would it help if I tried snapshots between 1.3.14 and 1.3.15 to narrow > it down? I find that this is the last snapshot without the problem: CYGWIN_NT-4.0 BRYCE 1.3.15s(0.62/3/2) 20021103 23:52:20 i686 unknown This snapshot exhibits the problem: CYGWIN_NT-4.0 BRYCE 1.3.16s(0.63/3/2) 20021106 21:24:12 i686 unknown (Although I'm quite ignorant about Cygwin internals, my money is on the sigproc.cc changes...) Hope this helps. Regards, David -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/