Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 21:26:21 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: How can I use in console codepage different from ANSI and OEM? Message-ID: <20021104022621.GC28851@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20021103172352.GC2157@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 09:04:56PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >First off, in a followup message, the patch author claims to have received >a signed acknowledgement from RedHat -- hope this helps. Actually, it doesn't. I had already read that transaction (obviously?). Someone claiming to have received something from Red Hat is not really a legally binding transaction. >Second, would it make sense to modify the patch to make a third value for >codepage ("asis" or "none"), instead of making it a modifier? From what I >understood, there should be no difference between "codepage=oem:con-asis" >and "codepage=ansi:con-asis", which, in my mind, calls for a separate >value name... That occurred to me after I sent the email. I was kind of hoping the Egor would come to this conclusion. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/