Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 09:49:57 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: It's x86 Message-ID: <20021101144957.GD3332@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <5.1.0.14.2.20021031120202.01fec528@pop3.cris.com> <3DC255BB.D175D761@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3DC255BB.D175D761@yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 05:21:47AM -0500, CBFalconer wrote: >Such architecture optimizations are much more likely to have been >taken in the GUI gubris that is being used for display than in >GCC/GDB themselves. I think the moral is that such settings >should be recorded in the distribution. None of the mentioned gcc command line options were used in compiling gdb. This is getting tiresome. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/