Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: RE: gdb hangs on a 486 (dead msg thread) Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:22:16 -0500 Message-ID: <7BFCE5F1EF28D64198522688F5449D5AD63A98@xchangeserver2.storigen.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: "Scott Prive" To: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g9VKN4E11501 Yes, I read your email.. when it arrived. If there were no latency in mail, I would *even* have seen it before replying to Larry. I suspect redhat.com email routes more quickly on the inside :-) > -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf@redhat.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 2:56 PM > To: cygwin@cygwin.com > Subject: Re: gdb hangs on a 486 > > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 02:46:58PM -0500, Scott Prive wrote: > >>Thanks for the clarification Scott. > > > >NP. When someone contributes a patch, I'll be sure to transfer those > >thanks since I don't deserve them (suggestions are *always* > free..) ;-) > > Is anyone reading my previous message? This SHOULD NOT BE AN ISSUE. > There is no need for a patch. > > cgf > > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > > > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/