Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Package review status
From: Robert Collins <rbcollins@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
In-Reply-To: <20020925235243.GA1261@redhat.com>
References: <LPEHIHGCJOAIPFLADJAHKEJMCNAA.chris@atomice.net>
	<1032951025.8300.101.camel@lifelesswks> <3D919DA9.1010503@scytek.de>
	<1032954343.22908.5.camel@lifelesswks> <3D91E548.1040300@scytek.de>
	<1032990763.22908.46.camel@lifelesswks> <3D924091.5070508@scytek.de> 
	<20020925235243.GA1261@redhat.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-X6AXx+WbQm58unsUhqoK"
Date: 26 Sep 2002 17:48:47 +1000
Message-Id: <1033026528.24358.121.camel@lifelesswks>
Mime-Version: 1.0

--=-X6AXx+WbQm58unsUhqoK
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 09:52, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> Actually, I would first suggest taking this off list.  If it turns out
> to be a cygwin problem then you can discuss things here.
>=20
> I think that speculating about someone's personal gpg keys is remarkably
> off-topic for this list otherwise.

Yep, sorry. End-of-thread.

Rob


--=-X6AXx+WbQm58unsUhqoK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA9krvfI5+kQ8LJcoIRAj2/AJ99DPP7B1VhcolZJJ5PDJI6f02+cQCggrhY
JNpqhRckiHDXFthINiDkcb0=
=tWxK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-X6AXx+WbQm58unsUhqoK--

