Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 18:36:13 +0300 From: Ville Herva To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: A Simple Real World Benchmark for Cygwin Message-ID: <20020902153613.GT3568@niksula.cs.hut.fi> References: <20020902101958.A27819@mn.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020902101958.A27819@mn.rr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i > TIME CPU MHZ DISK OS AND VERSION (secs) > ------ --- --- -------------- ---------------------------------- > 5 P3 700 IBM 7200RPM RH7.2, native > 180 P3 700 IBM 7200RPM win98 4.10.1998, cygwin 1.3.12-2 FWIW: winXP, cygwin 1.3.12(0.54/3/2), 2xP3 900, 18GB 10k scsi ./configure 15.81s user 15.41s system 102% cpu 30.329 total linux-2.2.21pre2, celeron-1000, old 9GB 7200 scsi ./configure 1.37s user 0.81s system 18% cpu 11.776 total linux-2.4.13ac2, P3-600, 18GB 10k scsi ./configure 2.28s user 0.90s system 56% cpu 5.656 total I believe XP is much better than 98 with cygwin? -- v -- v@iki.fi -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/