Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
X-WM-Posted-At: avacado.atomice.net; Sat, 31 Aug 02 00:23:07 +0100
From: "Chris January" <chris@atomice.net>
To: "Cygwin@Cygwin.Com" <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: RE: Processor time bug in fhandler_proc.cc
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 00:23:05 +0100
Message-ID: <LPEHIHGCJOAIPFLADJAHCECJCLAA.chris@atomice.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
In-Reply-To: <20020830200653.14247.qmail@web21006.mail.yahoo.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Importance: Normal

> > I will make a patch for this that will also solve the problem with
> > the HERTZ
> > define.
> >
> > Please let me re-iterate here:
> >
> > Most of the /proc values DO NOT WORK ON WINDOWS 95/98/ME.
>
> Why not?
Because, AFAIK there is no way to get the required data from user mode.

That's not to say it's not possible, but rather I haven't investigated. I
don't use any of those versions of Windows so developing a solution would be
rather difficult and I am not motivated to do so.

Chris


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

