Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 12:08:54 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: suggestion for cygwin gcc-3.2 Message-ID: <20020817160854.GA1284@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 05:57:43AM +0000, Gareth Pearce wrote: >>This may generate some flames, so flame away if you want to. > >Hmm I expected a few as well, but no replys - I better fix that at >least. Maybe this will qualify as a flame. People here often have very thin skins, so... No. I'm not going to make the cygwin gcc operate any differently than the standard gcc 3.2. The correct place to lobby for change is in the gcc mailing lists. Wow. Real scorcher. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/