Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 11:33:34 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: GNU emacs 21.2-5 packages available Message-ID: <20020816153334.GB19518@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <3D5D01AB.7070206@hekimian.com> <3D5D0899.80007@st.com> <3D5D0F9A.80602@st.com> <3D5D1377.6060709@hekimian.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D5D1377.6060709@hekimian.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 11:00:07AM -0400, Joe Buehler wrote: >Pavel Holejsovsky wrote: >>>Does the process exit get noticed when you press control-g? >> >>Yes! Does it ring some bell to you? > >No, it's just something I noticed. There are all sorts of #ifdefs in >the subprocess code in emacs. I probably do not have something ported >quite right for Cygwin. This kind of behavior is usually due to a signal being blocked with sigprocmask and not correctly unblocked. It's possible, of course, that there is a bug in cygwin's signal code, somewhere, too. The strace snippet that was posted was just cygwin working as designed AFAICT. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/